State Sponsor
Implications
Designated Countries that repeatedly support international
terrorism (that is placing a country on the terrorism list)
imposes four main sets of US Government sanctions:
1.
A ban on all arms related exports and sales.
2.
Control over exports of dual-use items, requiring 30-day
Congressional notification for goods and services that could
significantly enhance the terrorist-list country's military
capability or ability to support terrorism.
3.
Prohibitions on economic assistance
4.
Imposition of miscellaneous financial and other
restrictions, including:
-
Requiring the United Stated to oppose loans by World Bank
and other financial institutions.
-
Lifting the diplomatic immunity to allow families of
terrorist victims to file civil lawsuits in US courts.
-
Denying companies and individuals tax credits for for
income earned in terrorist -list countries.
-
Denial of duty-free treatment for goods exported to the
United States
-
Authority to prohibit any US person from engaging in a
financial transaction with a terrorist-list government
without a Treasury Department license.
-
Prohibition of Defense Department contracts above $100,000
with companies controlled by terrorist-list states.

Cuba
Cuba continued to publicly oppose the U.S.-led
Coalition prosecuting the War on Terror. To U.S.
knowledge, Cuba did not attempt to track, block, or
seize terrorist assets, although the authority to do
so is contained in Cuba's Law 93 against Acts of
Terrorism, as well as Instruction 19 of the
Superintendent of the Cuban Central Bank. No new
counterterrorism laws were enacted, nor were any
executive orders or regulations issued in this
regard. To date, the Cuban government had not
undertaken any counterterrorism efforts in
international and regional fora or taken action
against any designated Foreign Terrorist
Organizations. The Government of Cuba provided safe
haven to members of ETA, FARC, and the ELN, and
maintained close relationships with other state
sponsors of terrorism such as Iran. The Cuba-Iran
Joint Commission met in Havana in January.
The Cuban
government continued to permit U.S. fugitives to
live legally in Cuba and is unlikely to satisfy U.S.
extradition requests for terrorists harbored in the
country. The United States periodically requested
that the government return wanted fugitives1,
and Cuba continued to be non-responsive. The Cuban
regime publicly demanded the return to Cuba of five
of its agents convicted of espionage in the United
States. The five were variously accused of being
foreign intelligence agents and infiltrating U.S.
military facilities, but the Cuban government
continued to refer to these individuals as heroes in
the fight against terrorism. One was accused of
conspiracy to murder for his role in the Cuban Air
Force's shooting down of two small civilian planes.
Cuba has stated, however, that it will no longer
provide safe haven to new U.S. fugitives who may
enter Cuba.
The
Although Cuba did not extradite suspected terrorists
during the year, the government demanded that the
United States surrender Luis Posada Carriles, whom
it accused of plotting to kill Castro and bombing a
Cubana Airlines plane in 1976, which resulted in
more than 70 deaths. Posada Carriles remained in
U.S. custody. Cuba also asked the United States to
return three Cuban-Americans implicated in the same
cases.
Iran
Iran
remained the most active state sponsor of terrorism.
Its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and
Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) were
directly involved in the planning and support of
terrorist acts and continued to exhort a variety of
groups, especially Palestinian groups with
leadership cadres in Syria and Lebanese Hizballah,
to use terrorism in pursuit of their goals.
Iran
maintained a high-profile role in encouraging
anti-Israeli terrorist activity, rhetorically,
operationally, and financially. Supreme Leader
Khamenei and President Ahmadi-Nejad praised
Palestinian terrorist operations, and Iran provided
Lebanese Hizballah and Palestinian terrorist groups
- notably HAMAS, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the al-Aqsa
Martyrs Brigades, and the Popular Front for the
Liberation of Palestine-General Command - with
extensive funding, training, and weapons.
Iran continued to play a destabilizing role in Iraq,
which appeared to be inconsistent with its stated
objectives regarding stability in Iraq. Iran
provided guidance and training to select Iraqi Shia
political groups, and weapons and training to Shia
militant groups to enable anti-Coalition attacks.
Iranian government forces have been responsible for
at least some of the increasing lethality of
anti-Coalition attacks by providing Shia militants
with the capability to build IEDs with explosively
formed projectiles similar to those developed by
Iran and Lebanese Hizballah. The Iranian
Revolutionary Guard was linked to armor-piercing
explosives that resulted in the deaths of Coalition
Forces. The Revolutionary Guard, along with Lebanese
Hizballah, implemented training programs for Iraqi
militants in the construction and use of
sophisticated IED technology. These individuals then
passed on this training to additional militants in
Iraq.
Iran remained
unwilling to bring to justice senior AQ members it detained in
2003, and it has refused to publicly identify these senior
members in its custody. Iran has repeatedly resisted numerous
calls to transfer custody of its AQ detainees to their countries
of origin or third countries for interrogation or trial. Iran
also continued to fail to control the activities of some al-Qaida
members who fled to Iran following the fall of the Taliban
regime in Afghanistan.
North Korea
The
Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) was not
known to have sponsored any terrorist acts since the
bombing of a Korean Airlines flight in 1987. The
DPRK continued to harbor four Japanese Red Army
members who participated in a jet hijacking in 1970.
The Japanese government continued to seek a full
accounting of the fate of the 12 Japanese nationals
believed to have been abducted by DPRK state
entities; five such abductees have been repatriated
to Japan since 2002. In the February 13, 2007
Initial Actions Agreement, the United States
agreed to "begin the process of removing the
designation of the DPRK as a state-sponsor of
terrorism."
Sudan
The
Sudanese government was a strong partner in the War
on Terror and aggressively pursued terrorist
operations directly involving threats to U.S.
interests and personnel in Sudan. In recent months,
Usama Bin Laden and other senior al-Qaida leaders
have called for the expansion of AQ's presence in
Sudan in response to possible deployment of UN
peacekeepers in Darfur. This has led to speculation
that some individuals with varying degrees of
association with AQ have taken steps to establish an
operational network in Darfur, but there were no
indications that AQ affiliated extremists were
active there.
With the
exception of HAMAS, the Sudanese government did not
openly support the presence of extremist elements in
Sudan. The Sudanese government took steps to limit
the activities of these organizations. For example,
Sudanese officials welcomed HAMAS members as
representatives of the Palestinian Authority (PA),
but limited their activities to fundraising. The
Sudanese government also worked to disrupt foreign
fighters from using Sudan as a logistics base and
transit point for Jihadists going to Iraq. There was
some evidence to suggest that individuals who were
active participants in the Iraqi insurgency have
returned to Sudan and were in a position to use
their expertise to conduct attacks within Sudan or
to pass on their knowledge.
Lords
Resistance Army (LRA) continued to be a threat to
Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC),
and Southern Sudan. The Government of Southern Sudan
worked to mediate peace between the LRA and the
Government of Uganda and sought to curb LRA raids,
but achieved little tangible progress. Although LRA
attacks declined significantly, renewed violence
remains a threat. Formal negotiations commenced in
Juba in July 2006. The LRA continued to stall the
talks, however, most recently with demands for a
change of venue and a halt to all Ugandan People's
Defense Forces activity in southern Sudan. Both
parties signed a Cessation of Hostilities agreement
in August 2006 identifying areas where the LRA could
assemble for the negotiations without fear of being
attacked by the Ugandan People's Defense Forces.
Syria
The
Syrian government continued to provide political and
material support to Hizballah and political support
to Palestinian terrorist groups. Palestinian Islamic
Jihad (PIJ), HAMAS, the Popular Front for the
Liberation of Palestine (PLFP), and the Popular
Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General
Command (PFLP-GC), among others, base their external
leadership in Damascus. The Syrian government
insisted that the Damascus-based groups undertake
only political and informational activities, but
Palestinian groups with leaders in Syria have
claimed responsibility for anti-Israeli terrorist.
Syria's
public support for the Palestinian groups varied,
depending on its national interests and
international pressure. In April, visiting PA
Foreign Minister Zahar (HAMAS) met with
Damascus-based Palestinian leaders and attended a
rally at the Palestinian Yarmouk refugee camp
alongside HAMAS Political Bureau Chief Khalid
Mish'al and representatives of other terrorist
groups and Hizballah. In July, Mish'al held a highly
publicized press conference under tight security at
a Damascus hotel, expressing gratitude for Syria's
unconditional support to the Palestinian cause.
The
Government of Syria has not been implicated directly
in an act of terrorism since 1986, although
preliminary findings of a UN investigation into the
February 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime
Minister Rafik Hariri indicated a strong likelihood
of official Syrian involvement. That investigation
remains in process.
On September 12, four Syrian nationals with alleged
Islamist ties used grenades, guns, and a small truck
bomb to launch an attack against the U.S. embassy in
Damascus. All four of the assailants were killed as
was a Syrian security officer who responded to the
attack. In the incident's aftermath, the Syrian
government enhanced security for the embassy and
American personnel in Syria, although it declined to
provide the embassy with the findings of its
internal investigation into the attack. Damascus
repeatedly assured the United States that it will
take every possible measure to protect U.S. citizens
and facilities in Syria, but at the same time has
not taken the measures considered necessary by the
United States.
In
2004-2005, Syria upgraded physical security
conditions on the border and began to give closer
scrutiny to military-age Arab males entering Syria.
(Visas are still not required for citizens of Arab
countries.) It also highlighted the repatriation of
more than 1,200 foreign extremists and the arrest of
more than 4,000 Syrians trying to go to Iraq to
fight. In November, Syria's foreign minister
announced the resumption of diplomatic relations
with Iraq after a 25-year rupture, and, a month
later, the Syrian and Iraqi Ministers of Interior
signed a five-year memorandum of understanding to
boost, among other things, joint efforts to control
the borders and combat terrorism.
As in
recent years, Damascus highlighted in Syrian
government-controlled press, information about
clashes on Syrian territory with terrorist groups,
particularly with the Jund a-Sham group. Separately,
in November, security agents on the Syrian side of
the border with Lebanon engaged in a gun battle with
a Syrian Islamic militant from the Tawhid and Jihad
group. The militant, who was trying to use fake
documents to cross into Lebanon, subsequently blew
himself up with a hand grenade.
